Williams v. Williams

57 S.E.2d 190, 206 Ga. 341, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 343
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1950·No. 16905·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

1. Where an agreement between the parties as to the amount of temporary alimony is made the judgment of the court, and subsequently the husband files a petition to modify the award, based on a change in conditions, and upon a hearing on the rule nisi the court awards a judgment for a different amount, such judgment is “granting or refusing applications for alimony” under the Code, § 6-903, and a motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.

2. While there is no mathematical formula for determining the amount of alimony to be awarded, and the trial judge has a wide discretion in fixing temporary alimony, and in subsequently modifying the same as provided in Code § 30-204, yet, under the evidence in the instant case, the award of $250 per month, where the income of the husband was $350 per month, was excessive and an abuse of discretion.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. *342 Sam G. Dettelbach, for plaintiff in error. George Carroll and Douglas, Evans & Cole, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Williams, 57 S.E.2d 190, 206 Ga. 341, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 343 (Ga. 1950).

57 S.E.2d 190 (Williams v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shrager v. Shrager
134 A.2d 69 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1957)
Frankel v. Frankel
94 S.E.2d 728 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Swinson v. Swinson
78 S.E.2d 25 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Johnson v. Johnson
62 S.E.2d 908 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)