Williams v. Williams

74 S.E. 242, 137 Ga. 791, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 150
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 13, 1912·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. Where a petition was brought for divorce and permanent alimony, and pending this action the plaintiff filed an application for temporary alimony and obtained a rule nisi thereon, requiring the defendant to show cause why the application should not be granted, it was unnecessary to embody in such application a prayer for ordinary process and have the same served on the defendant as in the case of an original suit. Nipper v. Nipper, 129 Ga. 450 (59 S. E. 226).

2. Under the evidence in this case, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in granting alimony and attorney’s fees.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Williams, 74 S.E. 242, 137 Ga. 791, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 150 (Ga. 1912).

74 S.E. 242 (Williams v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Adams
13 S.E.2d 173 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Bradley v. Bradley
148 S.E. 591 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Luke v. Luke
115 S.E. 666 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)