Williams v. Williams

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Williams v. Williams

2 D.C. 164

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 1, 1935

DocketEquity No. 55977

StatusPublished

This text of 2 D.C. 164 (Williams v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Williams, 2 D.C. 164 (D.C. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

LUHRING, J.

The evidence establishes that at the time of his marriage to the plaintiff, the defendant had contracted syphilis and concealed this fact from her. In July, 1933, upon examination, there was a positive Wasserman reaction in the blood and spinal fluid.

The Court finds, therefore, that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of annulment.

That counsel for the defendant, who was appointed by the Court, is entitled to a fee of $75.00 for services rendered, payable by the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

LUHRING, J.

The evidence establishes that at the time of his marriage to the plaintiff, the defendant had contracted syphilis and concealed this fact from her. In July, 1933, upon examination, there was a positive Wasserman reaction in the blood and spinal fluid.

The Court finds, therefore, that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of annulment.

That counsel for the defendant, who was appointed by the Court, is entitled to a fee of $75.00 for services rendered, payable by the plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 D.C. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-williams-dc-1935.