Williams v. Wilhoit

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Williams v. Wilhoit

234 S.E.2d 860, 142 Ga. App. 4, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1449

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1977·No. 53793·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

This is a pro se appeal in a civil case in which it is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain the legal issues *5 sought to be raised, and in which no authority is cited and no pagination references to the 3-inch record are made. Since this is a court for the correction of errors of law and none have affirmatively been made to appear by the record, we must presume the judgment to be correct. See Smith v. Forrester, 132 Ga. App. 426 (1) (208 SE2d 199) (1974).

Argued April 7, 1977 Decided April 13, 1977. Joseph P. Williams, pro se. Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, J. Edward Allen, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb, Judge.

This is a pro se appeal in a civil case in which it is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain the legal issues *5 sought to be raised, and in which no authority is cited and no pagination references to the 3-inch record are made. Since this is a court for the correction of errors of law and none have affirmatively been made to appear by the record, we must presume the judgment to be correct. See Smith v. Forrester, 132 Ga. App. 426 (1) (208 SE2d 199) (1974).

Argued April 7, 1977 Decided April 13, 1977. Joseph P. Williams, pro se. Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, J. Edward Allen, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Williams v. Wilhoit, 234 S.E.2d 860, 142 Ga. App. 4, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1449 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

234 S.E.2d 860 (Williams v. Wilhoit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related