Williams v. Warden, Whitworth Women's Facility

S.D. Georgia

Williams v. Warden, Whitworth Women's Facility

DecidedDecember 15, 2023

Docket1:23-cv-00164

StatusUnknown

This text of Williams v. Warden, Whitworth Women's Facility (Williams v. Warden, Whitworth Women's Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Warden, Whitworth Women's Facility, (S.D. Ga. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

AUGUSTA DIVISION

BRIANA KATRELL WILLIAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) CV 123-164 ) MYRA ORSBORN, Warden, ) ) Respondent.1 ) _________

O R D E R _________

Objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed by no later than January 2, 2024, must specify each proposed finding of fact and conclusion of law to which objection is made, must state the bases for each such objection, and must be served upon all parties. Failure to file objections by this deadline may result in this Report and Recommendation becoming the opinion and order of the Court. Devine v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., 212 F. App’x 890, 892 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). Failure to object to any proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s adoption of each such factual finding or legal conclusion. 11th Cir. R. 3-1. The Clerk will submit this

1 The Court DIRECTS the CLERK to substitute Myra Orsborn, the current Warden of Whitworth Women’s Facility – Petitioner’s place of incarceration at the time she filed her petition – as the proper Respondent. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-35 (2004) (explaining proper respondent in § 2241 case is warden of institution where the petitioner is confined); see also Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (explaining same in § 2254 case); Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). Report and Recommendation together with any objections to Chief United States District Judge J. Randal Hall, on January 3, 2024. Requests for extension of time to file objections shall be filed with the Clerk of Court for consideration by the undersigned. A party may not appeal this Report and Recommendation directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appeals may be made only from a final judgment. SO ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2023, at Augusta, Georgia.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

AUGUSTA DIVISION

BRIANA KATRELL WILLIAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) CV 123-164 ) MYRA ORSBORN, Warden, ) ) Respondent.1 ) _________

O R D E R _________

Objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed by no later than January 2, 2024, must specify each proposed finding of fact and conclusion of law to which objection is made, must state the bases for each such objection, and must be served upon all parties. Failure to file objections by this deadline may result in this Report and Recommendation becoming the opinion and order of the Court. Devine v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., 212 F. App’x 890, 892 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). Failure to object to any proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s adoption of each such factual finding or legal conclusion. 11th Cir. R. 3-1. The Clerk will submit this

1 The Court DIRECTS the CLERK to substitute Myra Orsborn, the current Warden of Whitworth Women’s Facility – Petitioner’s place of incarceration at the time she filed her petition – as the proper Respondent. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-35 (2004) (explaining proper respondent in § 2241 case is warden of institution where the petitioner is confined); see also Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (explaining same in § 2254 case); Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). Report and Recommendation together with any objections to Chief United States District Judge J. Randal Hall, on January 3, 2024. Requests for extension of time to file objections shall be filed with the Clerk of Court for consideration by the undersigned. A party may not appeal this Report and Recommendation directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appeals may be made only from a final judgment. SO ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2023, at Augusta, Georgia.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Williams v. Warden, Whitworth Women's Facility, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-warden-whitworth-womens-facility-gasd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack