Williams v. Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison
This text of 101 F. App'x 943 (Williams v. Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gary Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The district court dismissed Williams’ petition in an order entered on November 12, 2003. Williams’ notice of appeal, dated December 22, 2003, was received in the district court on December 29, 2003. In his notice of appeal, Williams stated that he “only received [the district court’s order] from Prison Staff on December 11.” Williams’ notice of appeal was made within the period of time applicable for a determination of excusable neglect or good cause under Rule 4(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and expressed his desire to preserve his appeal. See Myers v. Stephenson, 781 F.2d 1036, 1038-39 (4th Cir.1986). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting that court to determine whether Williams has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of time for filing a notice of appeal. The record, as supplemented, then will be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 F. App'x 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-warden-wallens-ridge-state-prison-ca4-2004.