Williams v. Ward

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION DANNY WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ) CV 122-134 TIMOTHY WARD; ADAM GREENE; ) SHERIFF RICHARD ROUNDTREE; ) JOHN REGAN; BRIAN KEMP; PASHION _ ) CHAMBERS; JERRALD WILLIAMS; ) and JUDGE EDWARD JOHN FLYTHE, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. no. 2), and DISMISSES this action without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this case, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). SO ORDERED this A day of November, 2022, at Augusta, Georgia.

DS // D4 J (AS Boller RA HALL, CHIEF JUDGE STATES DISTRICT COURT OUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA