Williams v. Vinson

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Vinson

317 F. App'x 366

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2009·No. No. 08-8409·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the court. Williams v. Officer Vinson, No. 1:08-cv-00851-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 22, 2008 & entered Oct. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the court. Williams v. Officer Vinson, No. 1:08-cv-00851-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 22, 2008 & entered Oct. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. Vinson, 317 F. App'x 366 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

317 F. App'x 366 (Williams v. Vinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related