Williams v. Vanmetre

19 Ill. 293
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Caton, C. J.

This record seems to be beset with errors from beginning to end, a bare statement of which will be sufficient.

In the first place, it does not appear that the seal of the court was attached to the writ, for which reason it was void.

Again, one Henry interpleaded, showing that the property attached was his, and that it did not belong to the defendant in attachment. This interpleader remains unanswered, and hence must be taken to be true.

And, finally, a judgment was rendered against Williams, the garnishee, without the filing of any interrogatories for him to answer, or the renderings of any conditional judgment against, as for a default, and the issuing of a scire facias against him. These are rendered indispensable prerequisites by the statute, before any final valid judgment can be rendered against the garnishee. Cook’s Statutes, 231, 232, §§ 16-18.

The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Vanmetre, 19 Ill. 293 (Ill. 1857).

19 Ill. 293 (Williams v. Vanmetre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chicago Catholic Workers' Credit Union v. Rosenberg
104 N.E.2d 568 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1952)
Southwestern Settlement & Development Co. v. Randolph
240 S.W. 655 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Rosewater v. Schwab Clothing Co.
25 S.W. 73 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1894)
Choate v. Spencer
20 L.R.A. 424 (Montana Supreme Court, 1893)
Juilliard v. May
22 N.E. 477 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1889)
State v. Davis
73 Ind. 359 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Clayburg v. Ford
3 Ill. App. 542 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1878)
City Insurance v. Commercial Bank
68 Ill. 348 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1873)