Williams v. Utilities Engineering Institute
64 N.E.2d 302, 116 Ind. App. 452, 1946 Ind. App. LEXIS 107
Opinion
Nothing is presented by appellant’s brief. It does not attempt to comply with Rule 2-17, Rules of the Supreme Court, and does not contain any of the essential matters required by that rule. Upon careful examination of it we are unable to discover what happened in the trial court or what appellant seeks to present here.
Judgment affirmed.
Note. — Reported in 64 N. E. (2d) 302.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Utilities Engineering Institute, 64 N.E.2d 302, 116 Ind. App. 452, 1946 Ind. App. LEXIS 107 (Ind. Ct. App. 1946).
64 N.E.2d 302 (Williams v. Utilities Engineering Institute) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
WATERS v. Perfect Circle Corporation
114 N.E.2d 436 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1953)
Public Service Commission v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.
108 N.E.2d 889 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1953)
Board of Commissioners v. State
105 N.E.2d 904 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1952)
Kelly v. Rihm
105 N.E.2d 181 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1952)