Williams v. Unknown
This text of Williams v. Unknown (Williams v. Unknown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JAMAL WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 3:22cv467 UNKNOWN, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION The petitioner, a Virginia prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a letter to the Court. (ECF No. 1.) Given the content of this document, the Court found it was appropriate to give the petitioner the opportunity to pursue this action as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Rivenbark y. Virginia, 305 F. App’x 144, 145 (4th Cir. 2008). By Memorandum Order entered on July 11, 2022, the Court directed the petitioner, within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof, to complete and return the standardized form for filing a § 2254 petition if he wished to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (ECF No. 2.) The Court warned the petitioner that the failure to comply with the terms of the July 11 Memorandum Order would result in the dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More than thirty (30) days have elapsed, and the petitioner has not completed and returned the § 2254 form. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability will be DENIED. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion
Date:24 August 2022 Richmond, Virginia john A. Gibney, Ir ; Senior United StatgS Distyict Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. Unknown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-unknown-vaed-2022.