Williams v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma·Decided September 19, 2019·No. 5:19-cv-00640·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

JABRIEL WILLIAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-19-640-G ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER On August 29, 2019, the Court issued an Order adopting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones (Doc. No. 5). In accordance with Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375 (2003), the Court advised Petitioner that it intended to recharacterize his 28 U.S.C § 2241 petition as a § 2255 motion, advised Petitioner of the potential consequences of recharacterization, and provided Petitioner the opportunity to withdraw his Petition prior to such recharacterization. In response, Petitioner submitted a letter on September 9, 2019, in which he states, “Disregard my 2241.” Doc. No. 6, at 1. The Court construes Petitioner’s submission as a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), 81(a)(4). Because Petitioner has voluntarily dismissed his § 2241 Petition within the time prescribed in the Court’s August 29, 2019 Order, the Court will not recharacterize the Petition as arising under § 2255. This action is deemed dismissed without prejudice effective September 9, 2019. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2019.

CHARLES B. GOODWIN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. United States, (W.D. Okla. 2019).

Williams v. United States (Williams v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castro v. United States
540 U.S. 375 (Supreme Court, 2003)