Williams v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Williams v. United States

147 A.2d 445, 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 337

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided January 2, 1959·No. Nos. 2280, 2281·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by the court, trial by jury having been waived, of unlawful entry¹ and petit larceny.²

His chief contention is that the court erred in denying his motion made during trial to suppress certain evidence. From a review of the record we hold that in view of all the circumstances the ruling was correct. We have examined the other questions raised and find no error affecting substantial rights. The judgments accordingly are

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by the court, trial by jury having been waived, of unlawful entry¹ and petit larceny.²

His chief contention is that the court erred in denying his motion made during trial to suppress certain evidence. From a review of the record we hold that in view of all the circumstances the ruling was correct. We have examined the other questions raised and find no error affecting substantial rights. The judgments accordingly are

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Williams v. United States, 147 A.2d 445, 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 337 (D.C. 1959).

Pincite

147 A.2d 445 (Williams v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.