Williams v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Williams v. United States

220 F. 1007, 135 C.C.A. 666, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2554

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 8, 1915

DocketNo. 4272

StatusPublished

This text of 220 F. 1007 (Williams v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. United States, 220 F. 1007, 135 C.C.A. 666, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2554 (8th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

AMIDON, District Judge.

This is a suit brought by the United States to cancel a power of attorney executed by a full-blood Choctaw Indian. The power of attorney is identical, in its provisions and the persons named as agents, with the instrument that was involved in Williams v. White et al., 218 Fed. 797, 134 C. C. A. 485, decided by this court November 10, 1914. The trial court held the instrument to be void. The decision is affirmed on the authority of the case referred to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMIDON, District Judge.

This is a suit brought by the United States to cancel a power of attorney executed by a full-blood Choctaw Indian. The power of attorney is identical, in its provisions and the persons named as agents, with the instrument that was involved in Williams v. White et al., 218 Fed. 797, 134 C. C. A. 485, decided by this court November 10, 1914. The trial court held the instrument to be void. The decision is affirmed on the authority of the case referred to.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 F. 1007, 135 C.C.A. 666, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-united-states-ca8-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack