Williams v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. United States

510 F. App'x 297

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2013·No. No. 12-2460·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harry Jamal Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint against federal officials. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-02682-PJM, 2012 WL 4854778 (D.Md. Oct. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[298] terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harry Jamal Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint against federal officials. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-02682-PJM, 2012 WL 4854778 (D.Md. Oct. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[298] terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. United States, 510 F. App'x 297 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

510 F. App'x 297 (Williams v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.