Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

53 F. App'x 248
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 2002
DocketNo. 02-1722
StatusPublished

This text of 53 F. App'x 248 (Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 53 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thaddeus D. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting summary judg[249]*249ment in favor of United Parcel Service, Inc. on his claims arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, as stated from the bench. See Williams v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., No. CA-01-579 (E.D. Va. June 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 F. App'x 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-united-parcel-service-inc-ca4-2002.