Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad
This text of 205 Kan. 61 (Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The Union Pacific Railroad Company filed a motion for rehearing on the decision affirming the judgments in this case. (Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 204 Kan. 772, 465 P. 2d 975.) The motion has been considered and it is denied.
However, our attention has been directed to certain statements in the opinion which are incorrect and should be deleted. Accordingly the first full sentence at the top of page 779 of the opinion, which begins “Appellant insists it was error . . .", is deleted.
In addition paragraph two on page 779 of the opinion is deleted, together with the first sentence of the next paragraph which begins, “Yet another reason appears . .
We adhere in all other respects to what was said and held in the original opinion, since the portions deleted are not necessary to the opinion and do not change the ultimate decision of this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 Kan. 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-union-pacific-railroad-kan-1970.