Williams v. Treece

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee
DecidedMarch 27, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-01069
StatusUnknown

This text of Williams v. Treece (Williams v. Treece) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Treece, (W.D. Tenn. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

LUTHER RAY WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) VS. ) No. 20-1069-JDT-cgc ) KENT TREECE, ET AL., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1)-(2) OR PAY THE $400 CIVIL FILING FEE

On March 23, 2020, Plaintiff Luther Ray Williams, who is incarcerated at the Obion County Jail in Union City, Tennessee, filed a pro se civil complaint. (ECF No. 1.) However, Plaintiff neglected to submit either the $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a)-(b) or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)-(b), a prisoner bringing a civil action must pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 Although the obligation to pay the fee accrues at the moment the case is filed, see McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 605 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on other grounds

1 The civil filing fee is $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The Schedule of Fees set out following the statute also requires the Clerk to collect an administrative fee of $50 for filing any civil case. However, the additional $50 fee will not apply if Plaintiff ultimately is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. by LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013), the PLRA provides the prisoner the opportunity to make a “down payment” of a partial filing fee and pay the remainder in installments. Id. at 604. However, in order to take advantage of the installment procedures,

the prisoner must complete and submit to the district court, along with the complaint, an in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the last six months. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit, within 30 days after the date of this order, either the entire $400 civil filing fee or a properly completed and signed application to proceed

in forma pauperis along with a current, certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the last six months.2 The Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the prisoner in forma pauperis affidavit form along with this order. If Plaintiff needs additional time to submit the necessary documents, he may, within 30 days after the date of this order, file a motion for an extension of time.

If Plaintiff timely submits the necessary documents and the Court finds that he is indeed indigent, the Court will grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and assess only a $350 filing fee in accordance with the installment procedures of § 1915(b). However, if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order in a timely manner the Court will deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, assess the entire $400 filing fee from his inmate trust account

without regard to the installment procedures, and dismiss the action without further notice

2 Plaintiff included a trust account statement as an exhibit to support the claims in his complaint. (ECF No. 1 at PageID 4-5.) However, that statement is not current, so Plaintiff must submit an updated six-month statement with an in forma pauperis affidavit. for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). McGore, 114 F.3d at 605.3 If Plaintiff is transferred to a different prison or released, he is ORDERED to notify

the Court immediately, in writing, of his change of address. Failure to abide by this requirement may likewise result in the dismissal of this case without further notice, for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ James D. Todd JAMES D. TODD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3 Even a voluntary dismissal by Plaintiff will not eliminate the obligation to pay the filing fee. McGore, 114 F.3d at 607; see also In re Alea, 286 F.3d 378, 381 (6th Cir. 2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Williams v. Treece, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-treece-tnwd-2020.