Williams v. Thompson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 433 F. App'x 156
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2011·No. 11-6109·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6109

LARRY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN W. THOMPSON; MAJOR NETTLES; LIEUTENANT OWENS, as shift; CAPTAIN AL COXTE; WARDEN HUNTER; S. JONES, Mail Room Staff,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:10-cv-02392-MBS)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Williams appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed under the Prisoner Litigation

Reform Act, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Williams v. Thompson, No. 3:10-cv-02392-MBS (D.S.C. Jan.

14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Thompson, (4th Cir. 2011).

Williams v. Thompson (Williams v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related