Williams v. Thompson
This text of Williams v. Thompson (Williams v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1876
GERALDINE J. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOMMY G. THOMPSON, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-2084-8-AW)
Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: January 10, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William J. Howard, HOWARD AND MARCUS, Hyattsville, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Geraldine J. Williams appeals the district court’s order
granting defendant’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v.
Thompson, No. CA-03-2084-8-AW (D. Md. June 14, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. Thompson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-thompson-ca4-2005.