Williams v. Thompson

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Thompson

117 F. App'x 310

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 10, 2005·No. No. 04-1876·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Geraldine J. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Thompson, No. CA-03-2084-8-AW (D. Md. June 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Geraldine J. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Thompson, No. CA-03-2084-8-AW (D. Md. June 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. Thompson, 117 F. App'x 310 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

117 F. App'x 310 (Williams v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.