Williams v. The Russo's Payroll Group, Inc.

E.D. New York

Williams v. The Russo's Payroll Group, Inc.

DecidedSeptember 6, 2024

Docket1:21-cv-02922

StatusUnknown

This text of Williams v. The Russo's Payroll Group, Inc. (Williams v. The Russo's Payroll Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. The Russo's Payroll Group, Inc., (E.D.N.Y. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

KALIEF WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, ORDER – against – 21-cv-02922 (NCM) (CLP) THE RUSSO’S PAYROLL GROUP, INC., d/b/a Russo’s on the Bay; ROBERT “ROBBIE” RUSSO; and GIUSEPPE JOE VACCA, Defendants.

NATASHA C. MERLE, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Sua Sponte Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on the instant case dated August 8, 2024, from the Honorable Cheryl L. Pollak, United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-cv-00874, 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011), aff’d, 472 F. App’x 73 (2d Cir. 2012) (summary order). Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-cv-00371, 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Est. of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imps. Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, the Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, Judge Pollak’s R&R is fully adopted as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Robert “Robbie” Russo are dismissed pursuant to Rule 25(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED.

__/s/ Natasha C. Merle___ NATASHA C. MERLE United States District Judge

Dated: September 6, 2024 Brooklyn, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

KALIEF WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, ORDER – against – 21-cv-02922 (NCM) (CLP) THE RUSSO’S PAYROLL GROUP, INC., d/b/a Russo’s on the Bay; ROBERT “ROBBIE” RUSSO; and GIUSEPPE JOE VACCA, Defendants.

NATASHA C. MERLE, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Sua Sponte Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on the instant case dated August 8, 2024, from the Honorable Cheryl L. Pollak, United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-cv-00874, 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011), aff’d, 472 F. App’x 73 (2d Cir. 2012) (summary order). Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-cv-00371, 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Est. of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imps. Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, the Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, Judge Pollak’s R&R is fully adopted as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Robert “Robbie” Russo are dismissed pursuant to Rule 25(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED.

__/s/ Natasha C. Merle___ NATASHA C. MERLE United States District Judge

Dated: September 6, 2024 Brooklyn, New York

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Williams v. The Russo's Payroll Group, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-the-russos-payroll-group-inc-nyed-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack