Williams v. the Bibb Company

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedSeptember 18, 1995
DocketI.C. No. 021623
StatusPublished

This text of Williams v. the Bibb Company (Williams v. the Bibb Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. the Bibb Company, (N.C. Super. Ct. 1995).

Opinion

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act, and all claims and notices as required by law were properly and timely filed regarding all parties.

2. The employment relationship existed between the plaintiff and The Bibb Company at all relevant times from November 16, 1988 to December 12, 1989.

3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company was the workers' compensation carrier on the risk from November 16, 1988 to December 12, 1989.

4. Plaintiff's average weekly wage with The Bibb Company was $298.00.

5. A Form 18 was filed by the plaintiff on March 19, 1990, asserting that she had contracted an occupational disease during her work with the Bibb Company, to wit: carpal tunnel syndrome caused by synovitis or tenosynovitis, and a Form 21 agreement was entered into by plaintiff and The Bibb Company/Liberty Mutual on March 12, 1991, based on the Form 18 for an occupational disease to wit: carpal tunnel syndrome or synovitis/tenosynovitis (wrist injury).

6. The employment relationship existed between the plaintiff and Carroll Foods at all relevant times on and after August 22, 1992.

7. The PMA Group was the workers' compensation carrier on the risk while plaintiff was working for Carroll Foods.

8. Plaintiff's last date of work with Carroll Foods was March 22, 1993.

9. A Form 21 Agreement was entered into by the parties for plaintiff's back injury on January 15, 1993.

10. The following documents were received into evidence subject to the right of either party to depose the medical witnesses pursuant to Industrial Commission order:

Exhibit 1 Sixteen pages of medical records dated 12/26/89 through 4/15/93 from Dr. R. A. Appert and Dr. Michael J. Kushner of the Wilson Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurology Center, P.A

Exhibit 2 Ten pages of office notes from Halifax Diagnostic Center dated 11/3/89 through 10/27/93.

Exhibit 3 Nineteen pages of medical records from Wilson Memorial Hospital dated 2/21/90 through 3/1/90.

Exhibit 4 Nine pages of medical records from Halifax Memorial Hospital dated 7/14/92 to 11/6/92.

Exhibit 5 Seven pages of rehabilitation records dated 12/27/90 to 4/14/92 from Rehabilitation Services Group.

Exhibit 6 North Carolina Industrial Commission Form 21, Agreement for Compensation For Disability dated March 12, 1991 and approved by the Commission on June 26, 1991.

Exhibit 7 North Carolina Industrial Commission Form 18 Notice of Accident to Employer and Claim of Employee dated March 19, 1990.

Exhibit 8 Plaintiff's Carroll Foods personnel records dated March 31, 1992 to May 22, 1992.

RULINGS ON EVIDENTIARY MATTERS
The objections contained within the depositions of Dr. Robert Appert and Dr. Michael Kushner are ruled upon in accordance with the law and this Opinion and Award.

The Full Commission reverses the decision of the Deputy below and finds as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The plaintiff is a 31-year old female born on November 16, 1963. She is a high school graduate and has taken courses at a local community college.

2. Plaintiff became employed with The Bibb Company, a textile mill in Roanoke Rapids, on November 16, 1988. The plaintiff was hired to do repair and inspecting work in the production of industrial towels. During an eight-hour shift, the plaintiff flipped, folded and inspected from 900 to 1500 towels.

3. On November 28, 1989 plaintiff saw Dr. Fiorilli at Halifax Diagnostic Center because of problems with her right hand and arm. She was given a note stating — carpal tunnel right wrist and to return to work on December 3, 1989. Plaintiff was referred to Dr. Bisram for further treatment.

4. Plaintiff notified her employer, The Bibb Company, on 12/4/89 of problems she was having with her hands and arms by way of Dr. Fiorilli's note stating carpal tunnel syndrome.

5. The plaintiff was terminated two days after she took in a doctor's note stating that she had a work-related hand injury.

6. Plaintiff began seeing Dr. Robert Appert, an orthopaedic surgeon, on December 26, 1989. Dr. Appert admitted plaintiff to the hospital on February 28, 1990 with an admitting diagnosis of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome for bilateral carpal tunnel release. Because the plaintiff had young children she asked the doctor to only perform surgery on one wrist initially so she retain a functional hand to use to take care of herself and her family.

7. On February 28, 1990 the plaintiff underwent surgical release of the right carpal tunnel.

8. Plaintiff was released to return to work on March 21, 1990 with no restrictions.

9. The plaintiff became self-employed as a housesitter and choreworker for an elderly lady from December 15, 1990 until August 16, 1991 when her services were no longer required.

10. On March 12, 1991 The Bibb Company accepted compensability for plaintiff's carpal tunnel syndrome or synovitis/tenosynovitis on an Industrial Commission Form 21.

11. Pursuant to the Form 21, plaintiff received temporary total disability (TTD) from December 13, 1989, through December 15, 1990, or about 52 weeks. Pursuant to G.S. 97-30 The Bibb Company paid plaintiff temporary partial disability (TPD) from December 15, 1990 for necessary weeks, not exceeding the statutory maximum.

12. Beginning March 12, 1992 vocational rehabilitation services were provided to the plaintiff by defendant Bibb Company.

13. Plaintiff wrists continued to bother her and she has been under Dr. Appert's care from December 26, 1989 and continuing through the present.

14. Plaintiff also sought employment on her own and on March 31, 1992 secured herself a position with Carroll Foods as a pig breeder/midwife. Carroll Foods is a hog breeding farm. Plaintiff's job as a breeder required her to hook-up boars to sows for breeding purposes and return them to their pens. Plaintiff performed a variety of jobs as a pig breeding technician.

15. Plaintiff informed Carroll Foods of her pre-existing carpal tunnel injury from her Bibb employment at the time she was hired.

16. Plaintiff continued to have problems with her bilateral carpal tunnel injury and special accommodations were made for plaintiff by her new employer, Carroll Foods. Plaintiff was allowed to stop work and rest when her wrists began to hurt and co employees assisted plaintiff in her duties. Management at Carroll Foods, especially Mr. Matt Melhenbacher, made work-site accommodations available to the plaintiff to help her avoid further hand injury.

17. On August 22, 1992, the plaintiff suffered a back strain when a pig knocked her down. She was escorting a gelt (female pig) into the hog pen when the pig spooked, turned around, and hit plaintiff, knocking her down. The plaintiff landed on her buttocks and hands. The gelt then walked over and sat down on the plaintiff. Plaintiff filed a claim against Carroll Foods/The PMA Group for her back injury.

18. Carroll Foods admitted liability for plaintiff's back injury on an IC Form 21 dated January 15, 1993, and the plaintiff was paid 3 and 6/7s weeks compensation. She then returned to her former job with Carroll Foods.

19. On September 8, 1992 Dr. Appert rated plaintiff a 5% permanent partial disability of the right upper extremity as a result of her carpal tunnel syndrome and subsequent release.

20. Plaintiff continued to see Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Williams v. the Bibb Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-the-bibb-company-ncworkcompcom-1995.