Williams v. Talladega Community Action Agency

Supreme Court

Williams v. Talladega Community Action Agency

568 U.S. 1046, 133 S. Ct. 765

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 3, 2012·No. No. 12-6568·Published

Opinion

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Williams v. Talladega Community Action Agency, 568 U.S. 1046, 133 S. Ct. 765 (2012).

Pincite

568 U.S. 1046 (Williams v. Talladega Community Action Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related