Williams v. Suffolk Circuit Court
This text of 580 F. App'x 166 (Williams v. Suffolk Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s order remanding his state prosecution to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. To the extent that Williams sought to challenge the state court judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012), he is not entitled to relief pursuant to that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (providing remedies for a motion attacking a federal conviction and sentence). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 F. App'x 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-suffolk-circuit-court-ca4-2014.