Williams v. Stocks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Williams v. Stocks

91 S.E. 228, 19 Ga. App. 123, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 12

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 23, 1917

Docket7517

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 228 (Williams v. Stocks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Stocks, 91 S.E. 228, 19 Ga. App. 123, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 12 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

George, J.

Where no error of law is complained of which must finally govern the ease, no final judgment can be rendered on a petition for certiorari, except in a case in which the evidence is undisputed and where there can be but one legal verdict or judgment, under the evidence. Civil Code (1910), § 5201. The judge of the superior court did not err in remanding this case for a.new trial, and in refusing to render a final judgment, the evidence being in dispute.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Inihe, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George, J.

Where no error of law is complained of which must finally govern the ease, no final judgment can be rendered on a petition for certiorari, except in a case in which the evidence is undisputed and where there can be but one legal verdict or judgment, under the evidence. Civil Code (1910), § 5201. The judge of the superior court did not err in remanding this case for a.new trial, and in refusing to render a final judgment, the evidence being in dispute.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Inihe, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E. 228, 19 Ga. App. 123, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-stocks-gactapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack