Williams v. Stewart

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 28, 2006
• Docket: 05-7443
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7443

LEE ROBERT WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DR. STEWART, Columbus Correctional Institution; UNNAMED NURSE AND DOCTOR ASSISTANTS AT COLUMBUS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE; LIEUTENANT COLMAN, Columbus Correctional Institute; MS. HUNT, Superintendent at Columbus Correctional Institute; UNNAMED DIRECTOR OF NORTH CAROLINA INMATE MEDICAL RECORDS; CHARLES BULLOCK, Member of the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board; LUCIEN COPONE, III, Member of the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board; FRANCIS L. DYER, Member of the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board; JAMES C. JOHNSON, Member of the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board; HILDAGENE REID, Member of the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-04-567)

Submitted: February 15, 2006 Decided: February 28, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lee Robert Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Lee Robert Williams appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000) because it was filed beyond the

applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Williams v. Stewart, No. CA-04-567

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -