Williams v. Stevens
This text of 11 A.2d 435 (Williams v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation appeals from, an order in chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Sooy, disallowing its claim of $1,730 (it abandoned its additional claim of $70) against the late partnership of John W. Mecray, Frank B. Mecray and S. Irwin Stevens, trading under the firm name of John W. Mecray & Bro.
We have carefully examined the proofs as submitted, the law applicable thereto, and are entirely satisfied that the learned vice-chancellor reached a correct result.
Accordingly, the order disallowing appellant’s claim is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchakd, Case, Bodine, Hehbr, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Welds, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 A.2d 435, 127 N.J. Eq. 8, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-stevens-nj-1940.