Williams v. State

805 S.W.2d 474, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 52, 1991 WL 32401
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 13, 1991·No. No. 043-91·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

MALONEY, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at confinement for 75 years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Williams v. State, 800 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.App.—Ft. Worth 1990).

Appellant raises two grounds for review. After careful review we refuse appellant’s petition for review. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield, v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 805 S.W.2d 474, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 52, 1991 WL 32401 (Tex. 1991).

805 S.W.2d 474 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
894 S.W.2d 810 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Pritchett v. State
874 S.W.2d 168 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Michael v. State
864 S.W.2d 104 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)