Williams v. State

329 S.W.2d 284, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2722
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 28, 1959·No. No. 30931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is resisting arrest; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The statement of facts before us contains the testimony of only three witnesses and is not approved as a statement of all the facts adduced upon the trial. For this reason, we are not in a position to pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction or the legality of the arrest of the appellant, which are the matters raised in the appellant’s brief. See Dominguez v. State, 164Tex.Cr.R. 571, 303 S.W.2d 384, and Stockman v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 469, 303 S.W.2d 410.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 329 S.W.2d 284, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2722 (Tex. 1959).

329 S.W.2d 284 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wheeler v. State
338 S.W.2d 735 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Slater v. State
336 S.W.2d 163 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)