Williams v. State

170 S.W.2d 735, 145 Tex. Crim. 634, 1943 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 851
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 14, 1943·No. No. 22481·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of the liquor laws and assessed a penalty of ninety days in jail.

The record before us presents bills of exception relating to the contents of the complaint and information. A careful checking fails to verify statements made in the bills of exception, for which reason they cannot be sustained.

Other bills of exception relate to the introduction of testimony. We find what purports to be a statement of facts but it is in question and answer form instead of being prepared in the manner prescribed by law, which this court has frequently held to be mandatory. Not being able to consider the statement of facts, we are unable to appraise the bills of exception. Nothing else is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 170 S.W.2d 735, 145 Tex. Crim. 634, 1943 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 851 (Tex. 1943).

170 S.W.2d 735 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. State
330 S.W.2d 455 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Rodgers v. State
328 S.W.2d 301 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Payne v. State
298 S.W.2d 151 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)
Henderson v. State
295 S.W.2d 215 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Rushing v. State
216 S.W.2d 225 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)
May v. State
209 S.W.2d 606 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Davis v. State
197 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Singleton v. State
195 S.W.2d 139 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Edwards v. State
185 S.W.2d 111 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1945)