Williams v. State

113 S.W.2d 1235, 133 Tex. Crim. 644, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 165

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 Tex. Crim. 577 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 16, 1938·No. No. 19462.·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge. —

Appellant was convicted of the offense *645 of possessing intoxicating liquor in dry area for the purpose of sale, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $150.

The record is before us in the same condition as the record in the case of Gholston v. State, No. 19,461, in which the judgment of conviction was this day reversed (page 615 of this volume).

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed, and remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge. —

Appellant was convicted of the offense *645 of possessing intoxicating liquor in dry area for the purpose of sale, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $150.

The record is before us in the same condition as the record in the case of Gholston v. State, No. 19,461, in which the judgment of conviction was this day reversed (page 615 of this volume).

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed, and remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Williams v. State, 113 S.W.2d 1235, 133 Tex. Crim. 644, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 165 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

113 S.W.2d 1235 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.