Williams v. State

112 S.W.2d 184, 133 Tex. Crim. 443, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 76
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 5, 1938
DocketNo. 19270.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 112 S.W.2d 184 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. State, 112 S.W.2d 184, 133 Tex. Crim. 443, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 76 (Tex. 1938).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. No complaint of the ruling of the trial judge has been presented by bills of exception.

The statement of facts accompanying the record cannot be considered by this court for the reason that same was not filed within the time prescribed by Art. 760, C. C. P., 1925. The *444 appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given May 1, 1937. The statement of facts was not filed in the trial court until September 24, 1937, which was 146 days from the date on which notice of appeal was given.

In the absence of the statement of facts and bills of exception, nothing has been presented warranting a reversal. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Womack v. State
139 S.W.2d 93 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)
O'Mary v. State
139 S.W.2d 800 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 S.W.2d 184, 133 Tex. Crim. 443, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.