Williams v. State

70 S.W.2d 592

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 Tex. Crim. 366 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 18, 1934·No. No. 16667·Published

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft from the person; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.'

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft from the person; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.'

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court

Williams v. State, 70 S.W.2d 592 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

70 S.W.2d 592 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.