Williams v. State

1 Thompson 97
Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1851·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

Totten J.:

Williams is indicted under the act of 1825. ch 63, § 3, for repossessing himself of land after being dispossessed in an action of forcible entry and detainer. After the recovery by the plaintiff in the action of forcible entry and detainer, an officer went upon the land to execute the writ of possession. The defendant was absent, and the officer gave the wife and children four days to yield up possession, which they did, and the officer returned afterwards and found them gone.

The Court below held this to be a dispossession within the meaning of the act. In this there was no error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 1 Thompson 97 (Tenn. 1851).

1 Thompson 97 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. City of Madisonville
5 So. 3d 874 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)
State v. Nelson
817 So. 2d 158 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)
Harris v. St. Bernard Parish Sheriff's Office
801 So. 2d 1146 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
State v. Stewart
785 So. 2d 1053 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
State v. Taylor
757 So. 2d 63 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Keel
734 So. 2d 74 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
Duffield v. Montauk Realty Security Co.
228 A.D. 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Donovan v. Powers Film Products, Inc.
14 Misc. 276 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)
State v. . Sprouse
64 S.E. 900 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)