Williams v. State
This text of 1 Thompson 97 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Williams is indicted under the act of 1825. ch 63, § 3, for repossessing himself of land after being dispossessed in an action of forcible entry and detainer. After the recovery by the plaintiff in the action of forcible entry and detainer, an officer went upon the land to execute the writ of possession. The defendant was absent, and the officer gave the wife and children four days to yield up possession, which they did, and the officer returned afterwards and found them gone.
The Court below held this to be a dispossession within the meaning of the act. In this there was no error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Thompson 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-tenn-1851.