Williams v. State Tax Assessor

Superior Court of Maine·Decided August 16, 2002·No. KENap-01-39·Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT

- CIVIL ACTION KENNEBEG, ss. DOCKET NO. AP-01-39 DONALD J. WILLIAMS, Petitioner Vv. DECISION ON APPEAL STATE TAX ASSESSOR, ~ DONALD L. GARBRECHT LAW LIBRARY Respondent SEP 3 2002

This matter is before the court on petitioner's petition for review of

‘Le

se onaee eBay 7

final agency action in accordance with M.R. Civ. P, 80C. Petitioner asserts three areas of complaint in the State Tax Assessor’s treatment of his 1986 calendar year and 1987 calendar year income tax assessments. Petitioner first complains that the assessments are erroneous inasmuch as he did not receive Maine-source income during the two years in question as defined in 36 M.R.S.A. § 5102(1-C). Secondly, petitioner complains that the respondent had disallowed a credit for taxes paid by the petitioner through the State of New Jersey contrary to 36 M.R.S.A. § 5224-A. Finally, the petitioner alleges that the respondent is incorrect as a matter of law in that he did not allow the petitioner to reflect net operating losses incurred in

1989 that the petitioner asserts is entitled to carry back for a deduction for the 1987 and 1987 tax years.

In accordance with 36 M.R.S.A. § 151, the Tax Assessor's decision on reconsideration is subject to review by this court which must conduct a de novo hearing and make a de novo determination of the merits of the case. The court shall make its own determination as to all questions of fact and law and the burden of proof is on the taxpayer.

The petitioner describes the circumstances of the taxable years 1986 and 1987 in terms of the operation of seven corporations, each corporation owned by D.J. Williams, Inc., a New Jersey holding company of which the petitioner was sole owner. Most of corporate operations were in New Jersey. One exception was a corporation known as Doran-Maine, Inc., a concrete pipe business in Leeds, Maine, formed in 1978. For purposes of ease of administration, including Social Security and tax withholding, the petitioner drew his entire salary from Doran-Maine, Inc. receiving IRS W2 forms therefor. During this time, he described the operation of various corporations as under a "managership" type of supervision. He admits that he retained the ultimate decision-making with respect to major policy issues but denies day-to-involvement. In 1982, the petitioner purchased two camps in Readfield, Maine, which he transferred to Doran-Maine, Inc. The camps

were sold finally in 1984. After the camps were sold, and as a result of child custody proceedings, the petitioner rented a small apartment at 9 Aron Drive in Auburn for himself and his son. His daughter also stayed there when in Maine. In December of 1986, petitioner had his Maine corporation purchase a house in Monmouth.

In 1985, the petitioner’s eldest daughter graduated from college and came to Maine to work at Doran-Maine, Inc. Very soon after joining the company, the daughter became vice-president and was running the company day-to-day operations, i.e., a manager. The petitioner admits that he physically attended the Leeds plant of Doran-Maine, Inc. two days a week but asserts that he was in New Jersey operating out of D.J. Williams an average of three days per week.

During this time, the petitioner's only residential property ownership interest in the State of New Jersey was title as a co-owner of the marital home awarded to his ex-wife in the divorce proceedings. When in New Jersey, petitioner stayed at the home of his parents.

The first fundamental issue before the court is a determination whether petitioner became a resident of Maine, as contemplated by the income tax statutes, and if so, when. If the petitioner is a resident individual, Maine law provides that his Maine adjusted gross income is his

federal adjusted gross income for the taxable period. If the petitioner is a nonresident, his Maine adjusted gross income is that part of his federal adjusted gross income derived from sources within the State, i.e., his Maine- source income. 36 M.R.S.A. § 5102(1-C).

The law goes on to describe a "resident individual" as meaning a person either who is domiciled in Maine, or if not domiciled in Maine, he maintains a permanent place of abode in this State and spends in the aggregate more than 183 days of the taxable year in this State. 36 M.R.S.A. § 5102(5). If an individual changes his status as a resident or nonresident individual during the taxable year, the individual is required to file a nonresident tax return and his tax would be computed as if that individual were a nonresident individual. 36 M.R.S.A. § 5224-A.

As a matter of record, Mr. Williams admits that he was a resident of the State of Maine, at least for the period starting May 1, 1987. Therefore, was he a nonresident individual in 1986 and a nonresident individual in 1987 as a matter of definition? The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming that while the petitioner operated as chief executive officer of his various corporations through his New Jersey corporate holding company, he did the majority of his work situate in the State of Maine commencing in the early part of 1985. He negotiated from the State of Maine with the New Jersey

Environmental Protection Office through correspondence in the early part of 1985 from a Maine address. He commenced using Maine accounting firms to prepare tax returns and other financial documents starting in 1985. In 1994, he testified under oath in a Maine proceeding, that he moved to Maine in 1984. At that time, he made it clear that he had no desire to return to New Jersey. He testified in another Maine proceeding in 1995 that he had been a resident of Monmouth, Maine, since approximately 1986. He negotiated child support arrearages with a Maine attorney in June and July of 1986. He obtained a 1986 Maine driver's license on October 27, 1986, utilizing an address of 9 Aron Drive in Auburn, Maine. While there does not seem to be much dispute that he spent a considerable period of time in New Jersey undertaking business activities, he had no residence in New Jersey other than temporary stays at his parents' home, and he had temporary stays in Florida. From the time he sold his Readfield camps and acquired rental of an Auburn apartment through his acquisition of his Monmouth residence all circumstances mitigate to the petitioner being a resident of the State of Maine.

Title 36 M.R.S.A. § 5142(8) provides that minimum taxability thresholds for nonresidents are:

compensation for personal services performed in Maine is Maine-

source income, . . ., if the nonresident taxpayer is present in Maine performing personal services for more than 20 days during the taxable year and directly earns or derives more than $6,000 in gross income during the taxable year in Maine from all sources.

The period from May 1 to December 31, 1987, is not in issue as it has been stipulated by the petitioner. Prior to that time, the petitioner, as president of Doran-Maine, Inc., provided supervision to his managers, negotiated real estate transactions, purchased, rented and fabricated equipment. In spite of the petitioner’s assertion that he was working only for D.J. Williams, Inc. but was paid through Doran-Maine, Inc., he has provided no documentation or other information to establish that his salary was ever debited from the books of D.J. Williams, Inc. Further, it is clear that in his acquisition of income from Doran-Maine, Inc., notwithstanding its involvement with all of his corporations, from the time his son moved to Maine in 1984 and his daughter in 1985, the petitioner spent more time in Maine than any other jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State Tax Assessor, (Me. Super. Ct. 2002).

Williams v. State Tax Assessor (Williams v. State Tax Assessor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.