Williams v. State
This text of Williams v. State (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Charles Christopher Williams, Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2013-001945
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal from Greenville County G. Edward Welmaker, Post-Conviction Relief Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2016-MO-012 Heard March 22, 2016 – Filed April 13, 2016
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Derek Joseph Enderlin, of Ross & Enderlin, PA, of Greenville, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia, and William W. Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent. Louis O'Neill, of White & Case, LLP, of New York, New York and John S. Nichols, of Bluestein Nichols Thompson & Delgado, LLC, of Columbia, for Amicus Curiae, The Federal Republic of Germany.
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the post- conviction relief judge. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN and FEW, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-sc-2016.