Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Williams v. State

1930 OK CR 95, 286 P. 23, 46 Okla. Crim. 447, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 421

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 15, 1930

DocketNo. A-7141.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 95 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 1930 OK CR 95, 286 P. 23, 46 Okla. Crim. 447, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 421 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Bryan county on a charge of riot, and was sentenced to serve a term of two years in the state penitentiary.

*448 The case was tried in February, 1828, and the appeal was lodged in this court in August, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was any appearance for oral argument made at the time the case was submitted. Defendant was jointly charged with two others, but was tried separately. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment, and discloses that at the time of the commission of the offense defendant carried a dangerous weapon, and his punishment is fixed by the third subdivision of section 2007, Comp. Stat. 1921, which provides that in such case the punishment shall be in the penitentiary not less than two-, nor more than ten, years.

An examination of. the record discloses no jurisdictional nor fundamental error.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Bryan county on a charge of riot, and was sentenced to serve a term of two years in the state penitentiary.

*448 The case was tried in February, 1828, and the appeal was lodged in this court in August, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was any appearance for oral argument made at the time the case was submitted. Defendant was jointly charged with two others, but was tried separately. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment, and discloses that at the time of the commission of the offense defendant carried a dangerous weapon, and his punishment is fixed by the third subdivision of section 2007, Comp. Stat. 1921, which provides that in such case the punishment shall be in the penitentiary not less than two-, nor more than ten, years.

An examination of. the record discloses no jurisdictional nor fundamental error.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 95, 286 P. 23, 46 Okla. Crim. 447, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.