Williams v. State

1922 OK CR 133, 209 P. 178, 21 Okla. Crim. 386, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 280
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Okla. Crim. 307
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 11, 1922·No. No. A-3984.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

P. R. Williams was convicted in the district court of Osage county of the crime of embezzlement, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

This appeal has been pending in this court sinee the 20th day of May, 1921, the cause having been submitted June 1, 1922, at which time no appearance was made by any counsel representing plaintiff in error, nor has any brief been filed in his behalf. Rule 9 of this court (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x) provides:

“When no counsel appears,, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and, if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment.”

An examination.of the pleadings, instructions, and judgment and sentence discloses no prejudicial error, and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 1922 OK CR 133, 209 P. 178, 21 Okla. Crim. 386, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 280 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

1922 OK CR 133 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.