Williams v. State

168 N.E.2d 723, 8 N.Y.2d 886

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

8 N.Y.2d 886 (1960)

Frank R. Williams, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
State of New York, Appellant-Respondent. (Claim No. 34104.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 23, 1960. Decided June 9, 1960.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Julius L. Sackman and Paxton Blair of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Robert W. Hartnett for respondent-appellant.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 N.Y.2d 886 (1960)

Frank R. Williams, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
State of New York, Appellant-Respondent. (Claim No. 34104.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 23, 1960. Decided June 9, 1960.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Julius L. Sackman and Paxton Blair of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Robert W. Hartnett for respondent-appellant.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Williams v. State, 168 N.E.2d 723, 8 N.Y.2d 886 (N.Y. 1960).

Pincite

168 N.E.2d 723 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blanchfield v. State

104 Misc. 2d 21 (New York State Court of Claims, 1980)