Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

509 S.W.3d 155, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 54, 2017 WL 401918

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 31, 2017

DocketWD 79162

StatusPublished

This text of 509 S.W.3d 155 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 509 S.W.3d 155, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 54, 2017 WL 401918 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Bene’t Williams appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to six offenses. He contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to present mitigating evidence at sentencing concerning the circumstances surrounding some of the prior convictions listed in his sentencing assessment report. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Bene’t Williams appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to six offenses. He contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to present mitigating evidence at sentencing concerning the circumstances surrounding some of the prior convictions listed in his sentencing assessment report. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 S.W.3d 155, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 54, 2017 WL 401918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-moctapp-2017.