Williams v. State
760 S.W.2d 509, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1338, 1988 WL 99408
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3942 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion following an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 760 S.W.2d 509, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1338, 1988 WL 99408 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).
760 S.W.2d 509 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)