Williams v. State

743 S.W.2d 508, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4966, 1987 WL 1831
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3942
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 1987·No. No. 52707·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Rule 27.26, appellant sought to vacate his capital murder conviction and set aside his sentence of life imprisonment on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that defense counsel had proceeded in a thorough and professional manner at trial and denied the motion. Movant appeals.

The record in this case clearly supports the trial court’s conclusion that movant’s defense counsel provided effective assistance. Moreover, movant has failed to show a reasonable probability that the result of his trial would have been different but for the alleged mistakes of his trial counsel. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). We, therefore, conclude that the [509]*509denial of the motion was not clearly erroneous. An opinion would serve no prece-dential value.

Affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.-16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 743 S.W.2d 508, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4966, 1987 WL 1831 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

743 S.W.2d 508 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)