Williams v. State

456 S.W.3d 100, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 263, 2015 WL 1089959
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 10, 2015·No. WD 76846·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Damon Williams appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Williams sought to vacate his convictions for first-degree murder, section 565.020,1 first-degree robbery, section 569.020, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, and sentences of life without probation or parole, twenty years, and fifteen years imprisonment, the fifteen years to run consecutive to the other two concurrent sentences. He claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when counsel made “repeated misstatements of the facts supporting [his] theory of defense,” thereby “affect[ing] the jury’s [101] understanding of the case and impacting] its verdiet[.]” Because a published opinion would have no'precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 456 S.W.3d 100, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 263, 2015 WL 1089959 (Mo. 2015).

456 S.W.3d 100 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.