Williams v. State

83 So. 337, 121 Miss. 433
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1919·No. No. 20676·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

A re-examination of the law of this case has convinced xne that I was in error when I voted to affirm the judgment of the trial court, sentencing appellant to death. It is now my opinion that the facts did not warrant a conviction of murder. Section 1237, Code of 1906, was designed to meet just such cases as is made by the record before us.

It follows that I concur in the opinion written by Judge Holden (82 So. 318). Nothing I could say would add anything to his thorough and able discussion of the law and facts.

The judgment of the- trial court will be reversed, and the cause remanded for a retrial in accordance with the principles announced in the aforementioned opinion.

Reversed and remanded,.

Ethridge, Holden, and Stevens, JJ., concurring. Sykes and Smith, JJ., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 83 So. 337, 121 Miss. 433 (Mich. 1919).

83 So. 337 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owen v. State
171 So. 345 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)
Ashby v. State
102 So. 180 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)
Fletcher v. State
91 So. 338 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1922)
Williams v. State
90 So. 705 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1921)