Williams v. State
This text of 444 S.E.2d 166 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s conviction for selling cocaine was affirmed in Williams v. State, 201 Ga. App. 384 (411 SE2d 316). This direct appeal followed the denial of defendant’s extraordinary motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Held:
This appeal “is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, based on the [defendant’s] failure to follow the application procedures applicable to ‘(a)ppeals, when separate from an original appeal, from the denial of an extraordinary motion for new trial.’ OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7). See Pitts v. State, 254 Ga. 298 (328 SE2d 732) (1985); McDonald v. State, 180 Ga. App. 713 (350 SE2d 581) (1986).” Scott v. State, 200 Ga. App. 481 (1) (408 SE2d 495).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 S.E.2d 166, 212 Ga. App. 290, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1084, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-gactapp-1994.