Williams v. State

295 S.E.2d 339, 163 Ga. App. 550, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3226
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 151 Ga. App. 765
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 15, 1982·No. 64601·Published

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals from his conviction of burglary after a bench trial. Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). As envisioned by Anders, appellant’s attorney has filed a brief stating, in effect, that there is nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. As required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if any errors of law occurred. Our independent analysis discloses no errors requiring reversal. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted. After a review of the entire record, we find that any rational trior of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 295 S.E.2d 339, 163 Ga. App. 550, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3226 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

295 S.E.2d 339 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Baldwin v. State
264 S.E.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Bethay v. State
229 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)