Williams v. State

112 S.E. 524, 28 Ga. App. 552, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 678
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 9, 1922
Docket13378
StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 524 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. State, 112 S.E. 524, 28 Ga. App. 552, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 678 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence did not authorize the defendant’s conviction of the offense charged, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. B. H. Humphrey, Arthur W. Jordan, for plaintiff

in error, cited: 119 Ga. 118; 97 Ga. 209; 74 Ga. 840; 12 Ga. App. 551; 17 Ga. App. 295; Id. 728 (1), and cit.; 5 Ga. App. 228; 12 Ga. App. 363; 34 Ga. 342; 17 Ga. App. 820.

Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orr v. State
34 Ga. 342 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1866)
Wells v. State
22 S.E. 958 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Gaither v. State
45 S.E. 973 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Wilson v. State
62 S.E. 1003 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Berry v. State
86 S.E. 644 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 S.E. 524, 28 Ga. App. 552, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-gactapp-1922.