Williams v. State

112 S.E. 524, 28 Ga. App. 552, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 678
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 9, 1922·No. 13378·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence did not authorize the defendant’s conviction of the offense charged, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. B. H. Humphrey, Arthur W. Jordan, for plaintiff

in error, cited: 119 Ga. 118; 97 Ga. 209; 74 Ga. 840; 12 Ga. App. 551; 17 Ga. App. 295; Id. 728 (1), and cit.; 5 Ga. App. 228; 12 Ga. App. 363; 34 Ga. 342; 17 Ga. App. 820.

Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 112 S.E. 524, 28 Ga. App. 552, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 678 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

112 S.E. 524 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orr v. State
34 Ga. 342 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1866)
Wells v. State
22 S.E. 958 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Gaither v. State
45 S.E. 973 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Wilson v. State
62 S.E. 1003 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Berry v. State
86 S.E. 644 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)