Williams v. State

97 S.E. 563, 23 Ga. App. 129, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 81
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 3, 1918·No. 9920·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. The evidence submitted in behalf of the accused amply authorized the charge of the court upon voluntary manslaughter.

2. As presented by the 5th ground of the motion for a new trial, the ex elusion of the testimony set out therein -was not error.

3. Under the facts of the case the charge of the court upon the subject of flight was not error.

4. The verdict finding the accused gujlty of voluntary manslaughter was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to. grant a new tidal.

Judgment affirmed'.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding. Orrin Roberts, for plaintiff in error. W. O. Dean, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 97 S.E. 563, 23 Ga. App. 129, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 81 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

97 S.E. 563 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slappey v. State
13 S.E.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)