Williams v. State
This text of 196 Ga. 503 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A charge to the jury on circumstantial evidence is required only when the case is wholly dependent thereon. Nobles v. State, 127 Ga. 212 (5) (56 S. E. 125); Hegwood v. State, 138 Ga. 274 (75 S. E. 138); Brannon v. State, 140 Ga. 787 (7), 788 (80 S. E. 7); Clark v. State, 142 Ga. 601 (4), 602 (83 S. E. 223); Hicks v. State, 146 Ga. 221 (4) (91 S. E. 57).
2. That the charge omits an instruction as to the weight to be given to confessions (Code, § 38-420) is not cause for new trial, in the absense of a request therefor. Walker v. State, 118 Ga. 34 (3) (44 S. E. 850); Roberson v. State, 135 Ga. 654 (70 S. E. 175); Lindsay v. State, 138 [504]*504Ga. 818 (6) (76 S. E. 369); Smith v. State, 139 Ga. 230 (2) (76 S. E. 1016); Millen v. State, 175 Ga. 283 (4) (165 S. E. 226).
The special grounds of the motion being without merit, and the verdict supported by the evidence, and having received the approval of the judge, the judgment refusing the new trial is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 Ga. 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-ga-1943.