Williams v. State
This text of 77 S.E. 818 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where two defendants are on trial-for murder, testimony of a witness that he overheard one of the defendants, in conversation with his wife, admit the killing of the deceased is not inadmissible on the ground that the conversation between the defendant and his wife was a privileged communication. Knight v. State, 114 Ga. 48 (39 [592]*592S. E. 928, 88 Am. St. R. 17). Nor is it inadmissible because the other defendant was not present at the time of the conversation; the court fully instructing the jury that as to such other defendant the testimony was not to be considered in determining his guilt.
2. In so far as the requests to charge stated apt and pertinent principles, of law, they were covered by the general charge.
3. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 S.E. 818, 139 Ga. 591, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-ga-1913.